Department of the Interior, Leaked Draft 2018–2022 Strategic Plan

A CAES Report-card on Ryan Zinke

2017 CAES© permission to use any part of this article not in it’s entirety is required.

zinke_so_signing
©U.S. Department of the Interior

In a September, 2017 draft, obtained by obtained by Defenders of Wildlife, the Department of Interior, led by Secretary Zinke outlines the nefarious plan for our public lands.

We’ve done a little scorecard on how this plan weighs when compared to a transparent, receptive, forward-looking Interior Department serving the the majority of American’s by continuing and strengthening  our natural heritage, cultures, treaties, and astute, science-based use and/or protection of our natural resources.

1060x600-46dd541ab0736330d0d9b3ce9745cab2

MISSION AREA 1:  Conserving Our Land and Water 
GOAL #1:  Utilize science in land, water, species and habitat management supporting decisions and activities
GOAL #2 Manage DOI water storage and delivery to resolve conflicts and expand capacity
GOAL #3: Foster partnerships to achieve balanced stewardship and use of our public lands
GOAL #4: Inform land use planning processes especially for public use and access

Score:
 Teddy: established                                           Ryan: strip protections from 
          A. 150 national forests                                 A. 11.3 million acres of public lands
          B. 51 wildlife refuges                                   B. 218 million acres of marine environment
          C. 5 national parks                                       C. Reducing National Monuments              
          D. 18 national monuments                         D. Dismantling wildlife refuges                                                                                                            E. Gutting endangered and critical                                                                                                         species protections
Conclusion:
Teddy Roosevelt, would tell Ryan he needs to he protect our national monuments, institute better protections of our wildlife, land air and water.

trump_zinke_pollution-620x412

MISSION AREA 2 Generating Revenue and Utilizing Our Natural Resources 
GOAL #1 Ensure energy and economic security for America
GOAL #2: Ensure access to mineral resources
GOAL #3: Ensure public receives fair market value for resources; fees are reasonable and recover cost
GOAL #4: Focus timber programs on “healthy forests” lifecycle
GOAL #5: Manage grazing resources

Score:

A. Vocabulary error
“Sustainability” is a word that Ryan uses often, but doesn’t appear to have done his homework and looked up the definition.
       Evidence:
                        1. Cancelled moratorium on coal leases, while announcing a new round of                                leasing in the Powder River Basin, WY
                        2. Ryan announced offshore oil and gas leases in a 77 million-acre region of                              the Gulf of Mexico, while still recovering from the 2010 Deepwater                                          Horizon disaster
                        3.  Ryan joked to the National Petroleum Council that “fracking is proof that                               God’s got a good sense of humor and he loves us.”
Conclusion:
 Ryan demonstrates that his understanding of “sustainability” is that; limited resources (oil, gas, minerals, etc.) will secure a sustainable future for the American people. This misunderstanding will be devastating and possibly irreversably damaging to our evnironment, wildlife, and overall quality of life.

ap_17205854781768

MISSION AREA 3 Expanding Outdoor Recreation and Access
GOAL #1: Expand hunting, fishing, and other recreation on DOI lands and waters
GOAL #2: Enhance public satisfaction at DOI sites
Score:
A. Ryan has created trust issues with the majority of Americans
         Evidence:
                       1. closed-door dealings and speeches
                       2. refusal to publicly release his national monuments report
                       3. ethically questionable business travel
                       4. suspicious relationships with Political Action Committees
                       5. special attention to special interests
                       6. considering drilling adjacent to and even inside 30 national parks
                       7. ignored stakeholders of planning process for conservation of greater-sage                             grouse and how to balance that with other nultiple uses across the west.                              (A move that promotes continuing decline of the bird and likely putting it                              on the endangeres species list.)
Conclusion: 
Ryan fails to recognize people outside special interest groups, and does not know how to communicate with those outside his usual group of friends. He has total disregard, and no respect for the hard work of others who contributed work before him, nor how his changes will negatively impact them, the environment or the wildlife. He will also be throwing out not only the work already done, but also significant tax dolaars wasted that were used in developing exisiting protections and plans.

zinkebearsears_050917-0

MISSION AREA 4 Fulfilling Our Trust and Insular Responsibilities 
GOAL #1: Support tribal self‐determination, self‐governance, and sovereignty
GOAL #2: Fulfill fiduciary trust
GOAL #3: Strengthen economic and health capacities in the US Territories, and fulfill US compact obligations to the freely associated states
Score:
A. Vocabulary error
     “Sovereignty” is a word that Ryan uses as a noun, or a thing that can be supported.             This demonstrates his lack of homework doing with his vocabulary list and looking           up definitions once again.
           Evidence:
                          1. Reccomendation to shrink Bears Ears National Monument
                          2. Recommendation will stop protection of Indigenous artifacts
                          3. Recommendation will lift protections of Indigenous sacred sites.
                          4. Recommendation is in opposition to member tribes of the Bears Ears                                      Commission.
Conclusion:
On the heels of a new administration failing to hear, respect or honor Indigenous rights, or treaties, Ryan deals another blow to our First People recommending the decrease in size of National monuments such as Bears Ears, and lowering the protections for those very things that ought to be the decision of the tribes based on the sovereignty. If Ryan believes in sovereignty, he must learn the it is the right for our Indigenous Peoples “to make their own laws and be governed by them.”

zinke_murkowski_beer

MISSION AREA 5 Protecting Our People and the Border
GOAL 1: Ensure emergency preparedness & DOI law enforcement staffing addresses public safety risks
GOAL 2: Support securing our southern continental US border
GOAL #3: Manage wildland fire to reduce risk and improve ecosystem and community resilience
GOAL #4: Provide science to safeguard communities against natural hazards
Score:
As the Secretary of the Interior, Ryan should be asking for more money for his department right? He is failing this part of his job by recommending cuts during his testimony to the Senate in 2017 for the FY 2018 budget.
     Evidence:
          Recommendations made for the FY 2018 budget:
               13% cut for the BLM, USFWS, Bureau of Reclamation & US Geological Survey                               (Nearly half from Office of Surface Mining & Reclamation)
               11% cut for the National Park Service
          Rescinded policy that would make companies pay fair market value for oil, gas and                coal extraction on federal lands (loss of revenue to taxpayers $75 million)
Conclusion:
Ryan again seems to be leaning in favor of special interest, profit makong ventures, and not increasing funding to protects our heritage, resources or even our tax dollars. Instead the only way he has made any recommendation that would increas income for the department is the idea to triple fees to be admitted to our National Parks.


MISSION AREA 6 Modernizing Our Organization and Infrastructure for the Next 100 Years 
GOAL #1: Align DOI organizational structure and workforce to improve partnership engagement and mission delivery
GOAL #2: Reduce administrative and regulatory burden
GOAL #3: Prioritize DOI infrastructure needs and reduce deferred maintenance backlog
Score:
A clear agenda that is contrary to the job he is in. 
     A. Ryan doesn’t seem to understand that the Deparment of Interior doesn’t oversee                  the Customs and Border Protection, whic is actually acomponent of the                                 Department of Homeland Security. 
     B. Ryan claims conservation, safety and public health policies are “burdensome” on               energy production (oil, natural gas, coal and nuclear) in a report issued in response           to Executive Order 13783. The Dept of Interior feel that protections for wildlife and           habitat, science consultation for critical species and areas deemed areas of critical             concern are among these burdensome things. But that’s not all, he also feels that                 planning & appeals processes (that pesky public involvement component) and of               course all those exhaustive permits to satisfy legislative and administrative                         requirements. These all just get in the way of making “America Energy Dominant”.
     C. The National Park System has a $12 billion maintenance backlog, and the National             Wildlife Refuge System is suffering a $2.7 billion backlog yet Ryan calls for a $1.6               billion budget cut for his department. 
     D. Ryan’s “reorganization” through the reassignment of over 50 top staffers at the DOI            was done involuntarily and often to new positions in which the staffer had no                    expertise. This can never be productive for an organization to function efficiently.
     E. Ryan supports the elimination of about 4,000 jobs at the DOI. Further adding insult           to injury many more will be uprooted with his plans to move 3 DOI agency                           headquarters to Denver from Washington DC, a move that is clearly an attempt to             further keep the states that are not the west out of the loop on western land issues,             such as the push to transfer federal lands to states.
Conclusion:
The only issue that hould concern him with the border should be effects of a border wallon wildlife and habitat, including endangered species and several national wildlife refuges. Ryan needs to focus on a fair nd healthy balance between energy development and resource conservation that protects our future, not seeing these protections and policies as burdensome. While we agree that some positions in the Department of Interior could be eliminated, we disagree with moves or eliminations due to retaliation on those who disagree with Ryan and the special interest group he clearly works for. We do not believe moving offices that deal primarily with issues that are western issues to western offices is an appropriate way to represent those public land owners who live in the eastern states. This limits the information and public meetings access, along with contributing to a feeling of secrecy and “good old boy club” atmosphere. Taunting his own staff saying 30% are not loyal is not a professional way to handle human resources, and is not going to breed a healthy work environment, thus furthering the feeling of mistrust and division. 

∑ Overall Reportcard Score –  is that Ryan moved up a grade when he clearly was not ready.
Ryan Zinke’s actions are contrary to his job description, he has a clear dislike and disregard for conservation, preservation and majority interests. We believe it is time for Ryan to change jobs. He is no more qualified for this job than was the scientists he put into an accounting position. We believe that Ryan Zinke cannot achieve the goals of the Department of the Interior when he fails to realize that the goal is to protect and preserve, conserve and respect…not profit.

 

 

 

 

 

zinke signs order 16x9

Please remember that CAES and our other branched, National Wild Horse & Burro Administration and Public Lands Truth Campaign are 100% volunteer and we can only do the work we do with your support. Please consider making a contribution or becoming a member through a monthly donation.
Donate Here

Continue reading “Department of the Interior, Leaked Draft 2018–2022 Strategic Plan”

ACTION ALERT: STOP THE SECRET MEETING OF THE SOCIETY OF MAD SCIENTISTS AND HORSE HATERS!

20938941_10211853961197901_1445228357_n

**Tell USU President Noelle Cockett and Mad Scientist Messmer that they are breaking UT Code Title 52, Chapter 4, Open & Public Meetings Act. **

Talking points:

*NO public, state or federal funds, paid to the University, can be used for this CLOSED conference/workshop.

*Members attending, using taxpayer money to pay for entry fees, hotel or other travel expenses, are also breaking the law by attending.

*This closed meeting, in which they intend to discuss the fate of public resources (wild horses & burros) and how public funds, taxpayer dollars will be used to implement that fate, does not meet the requirements for closed meeting or executive session.

*The plan to record all but the panel discussion with the scientific ‘experts’ is unacceptable. The public has the right t know and hear the opinions of the scientists that this representative ‘coalition’ or horse haters bases their decisions on. (Too often the science is twisted to meet a pre-determined outcome.)

Flood emails, answering machines, and fax lines with messages expressing your outrage! USU must open this meeting to the press and public or face the consequences of violating the law!

Contacts:

Noelle Cockett
noelle.cockett@usu.edu
Business or work: (435) 797-1162
Fax: (435) 797-1173

Terry Messmer
terry.messmer@usu.edu
Phone: (435) 797-3975

Send a letter to the University Board of Trustees (the chairman of the board is Mr. Jody K. Burnett, if you want to address it to him) using this link:

https://www.usu.edu/trustees/contact/

CAES sent this letter to the University President, Mr. Messmer who is hosting the event (he is a professor) and the Board of Trustees. We’ve attached our letter here as well:

UT-WH-B-Conf-Letter-to-University

Read more about our fundraiser to send CAES delegate Patience to the meeting:

Wild Horse Summit Fundraiser!

Are Wild Horses Being Categorized for Slaughter?

Press Release: For immediate release

Are Wild Horses being Categorized for Slaughter?

Interior Secretary orders and inventory of wild horses in holding

On Friday morning, June 30, The Cloud Foundation (TCF) received an anonymous tip that Department of Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke and/or top Bureau of Land Management (BLM) officials have ordered all wild horses currently in short-term holding facilities be categorized by weight and age in anticipation of the approval of the federal budget. The current recommendation for this budget would allow for “sale without limitation” of many or most of the wild horses currently in holding.

This, of course, could eventually lead to the barbaric slaughter of our iconic wild horses. The tipster stated that this categorization was to ensure the BLM was ready to “ship out” horses older than five years of age. The only place to “ship out” these horses would likely be to slaughter. The caller stated that the shipping would start with the smaller facilities so that wild horse advocates would not be able to impose an injunction before the plan was already started. The caller also told TCF that direction has been given to one of the government’s top transportation officials to prepare for shipping.

Ginger Kathrens, Volunteer Executive Director of TCF said, “Surely Secretary Zinke would not allow for this devious, clandestine and under-the-radar ploy to destroy wild horses when 80% of Americans are against horse slaughter. If only Secretary Zinke and other DOI and BLM officials would have implemented tried and proven on-the-range-management ideas as we have requested for over a decade, we would not be where we are today.” Ms. Kathrens states, “Options such repatriation of older horses in holding to the millions of acres that were designated ranges for these animals is a much more human solution.”

“There are nearly 50,000 wild horses that have been rounded up, torn apart from their families, and corralled at the taxpayer expense because on-the-range-management has not been implemented. Hundreds of thousands of cattle and sheep graze at little or no cost,” says Lisa Friday, volunteer Vice President of The Cloud Foundation. “Our indigenous American icons deserve better.”

Media Contacts:

Lisa Anne Friday

The Cloud Foundation

804-883-6576 (o), 804-389-8218 (c)

info@thecloudfoundation.org, Lisa_Friday@chs.net

Original Post by The Cloud Foundation: http://www.thecloudfoundation.org/are-wild-horses-being-categorized-for-slaughter/

screenshot-www facebook com 2017-07-02 10-49-36